So there I
am, squatting in the front garden dead-heading asters.
This act
was a direct response to an issue raised by my sister, Gwen Eichorn, who
gardens at her home near Syracuse. We have been discussing such issues by email. Deadheading plants -- removing the spent
blossoms in order to stimulate the production of new blossoms -- is something
to ponder before leaping into it because it's a time-intensive activity.
The value
of this activity from the point of view of a time cost/benefit analysis has got
to be a persistent issue for the army of backyard gardeners, us amateurs, that
is, who don't go around snipping off spent pansies at professionally maintained
mansions, corporate headquarters and civic showplaces for a living. Frankly on
the macro level it sounds like a recipe for repetitive stress syndrome. Snip,
snip, snip. I've snipped a hundred or more faded blossoms (the old word for
this was 'blown') from a single coreopsis heliopsis, a perennial that looks
great in its gold-topped fully crown moment in the sun of July, but then grows
dark. The scores of unopened buds just millimeters behind the faded blossoms
proved an irresistible temptation.
My diligence met with minor
success. Maybe one new blossom for every 15 to 20 faded blossoms I decapitate.
This year I volunteered our daughter Sonya for that job on her 'vacation.'
Happily, she volunteers herself for time-consuming landscaping tasks whenever
she visits during the growing season.
Despite the
low rate of return, deadheading a coreopsis produces some satisfaction. With some other plants, like the pale pink anemones just finishing up, my attempts to stimulate color by removing the old
blooms have failed to make an appreciable
produced anything at all. I'm betting the technique works better
with annuals -- pansies, petunias, marigolds -- than it does with perennials.
Almost
everyone believes that it should work. I deadhead our Shasta daisies because
the blossoms are so large and white and generally happy
looking -- and besides, another gardener pointed out that I should be doing it
-- and because you can see the next round of fat little button-shaped nubs
coming up. Alas, very few of this palpable second round ever do blossom.
And then they usually prove smaller and kind of half-baked looking. More
'perfect' conditions for this flower's flourishing probably yield better
results from deadheading, as they do for almost all other aspects of the plant
growth. The results of my dead-heading may be limited by the fact that very few of
my plantings (i.e. almost none) enjoy "full sun."
This year, caught
up in drought-patrol, I never got around to deadheading the daisies. I did recently deadhead
our hardy mums -- and the perennial version called 'garden mums' (third and fourth photos down). So far no
results from a second generation of buds on those plants where the first the
blooms are already gone.
Asters,
however, are an interesting case. I have various perennial asters, only one of
them really flourishing (top photo), but some of the others producing a good burst of color
for about two weeks. But I can't remember if I attempted systematic
dead-heading before. Examining the plants closely, it appears that potential buds,
if not actual blossoms, are forming almost everywhere you look.
So this
year I decided to make the experiment. I attacked a plant with striking red
blossoms (second photo down), trimming carefully so as not to destroy any new baby-buds willing to
give open-air exposure a shot. I'm not sure any of these ever intended to do
anything more than pretend. We'll see.
And then I
attacked a blue, standard-color perennial aster, all of whose bright flowers
have quietly blinked out in the last couple of days as if somebody threw the 'off'
switch. On inspection, sure enough, many, many possible-buds -- very small, nearly countless -- lying up close, right behind the blown blossoms, even though
the lower parts of this plant appear to be drying out. I dead-headed about half
of these stems. Just in case I get any result, I have a clear basis for
comparison between the dead-headed stems and those that were not dead-headed.
The final
lesson for me is that although I consider this aster plant to be a very modest
specimen, far short of large and lush, when I concentrated on removing every single faded blossom from the chosen branches there proved to be scores
and scores and scores of them. It takes more flowers than you think to make
that true, blue impression.
So another
unanticipated insight from this experience: so much more is going on in every
flowering plant than meets the casual glance.
No comments:
Post a Comment