Ursula Le Guin is one of a few
writers whose work is so good that I hesitate to read too much of it out of
fear that I will never attempt to write anything again myself. Pigeonholed for
decades as a science fiction or fantasy writer, she is a reigning master of
the entire arc of the imaginative art of fiction, a member of the first rank of
her discipline.
In her acceptance speech in November
on receiving a Lifetime Achievement Award from the National Book Awards,
Le Guin pointed out that writers such as her -- "my fellow
authors of fantasy and science fiction, writers of the imagination" -- have
been excluded from the ranks of serious literature for the past 50 years in
favor of what she called, with invisible but palpable quotations,
"so-called realists."
"I think hard times are
coming," she said, "when we will want writers
who can see alternatives to how we live now, and can see through our
fear-stricken society and obsolete society to other ways of being... We will
need writers who can remember freedom."
She described "poetic" and
"imaginative" writers as "the realists of a larger
reality."
In the crises almost certain to come
as human society continues to lay waste to the planet's resources and
accelerate the pace of rapid climate change already well on the way, it seems to me that human
beings may well seek guidance from those pathfinders "of a larger
reality." When we are forced to make fundamental changes, find new ways to
live, human beings may come to regard visionary artists such as Le Guin among
its prophets.
Le Guin's acceptance speech also bemoaned
the reduction of the art of literature to a product, a means to make a profit. "Books
are not just commodities," she said.
"We live in capitalism,"
Le Guin told her audience. It's a 'reality' that appears inescapable, she
added, "but so did the divine right of kings... Any human power can be
changed by human beings."
I suspect that to the folks who chose the National
Book Awards, the works of writers of speculative and highly imaginative fiction
have been as examples of escapist genres rather than serious literature. Serious literature
should address the 'real' conditions of our lives. But just as our machines show us
bigger and bigger slices of the universe (or 'verses') we're part of,
speculative fiction expands our notion of the real.
When it's written by an artist like
Le Guin, scifi and fantasy can show us both what is, and what
may be -- or, in the words of Yeats' "Sailing to Byzantium," offer us
a vision of "Of what is past, or passing, or to come."
In books such as "The
Dispossessed," "The Left-Hand of Darkness," "The Earth-Sea Trilogy" and "The Lathe of Heaven" that's exactly
what she does.
In "The Lathe of Heaven,"
written way back in 1971, Le Guin offers us a character whose dreams retroactively alter reality. After her
protagonist (George) dreams that his aunt, who is very much a part of his
reality went to sleep, has died, he wakes to discover that she has died in a car accident six weeks before.
Poor George
later asks his shrink to consider whether other people might be able to dream
the way he does: "That reality is being changed out from under us,
replaced, renewed, all the time - only we don't know it?"
In "The Left-hand of Darkness,"
the author features a race of people who naturally change gender in the course
of a lifetime. Absurd -- a mere chimera? But if you're a man who takes estrogen
to treat proste cancer, you may find this "speculative" notion
remarkably close to home.
In "Rocannon's World," she
invents a world where winter lasts for seven years. Will human beings on Planet
Earth ever be asked to adapt to a radically different and more extreme notion
of "climate"? Don't look now, folks.
In "The Dispossessed," my
favorite of her politically speculative novels, an entire society trains its
young to think and behave and live as "anarchists." The interestng
hypothesis is that this society, while no utopia of ease, is far better
organized -- in addtion to fairer -- than any political structure currently on
earth is ever likely to be.
So, yes, we may in fact turn to the
fertile imaginations of the most speculative and poetic writers among us to
point the way on.
Le Guin's thinking in her talk to the
National Book Award people is in fact not far from the oft-quoted and apparently
revered notion of the poet Shelley two hundred years ago, who in his essay
"In Defense of Poetry" called poets "the the
unacknowledged legislators of the world."
This
is a rich notion indeed. When we think of the way modern, Western,
free-thinking, individualistic, autonomous man and woman has evolved, we may
agree with Shelley that, well, yes, the models were found in the arts --
romantic poetry, imaginative fiction, the English novel, essays of Votaire and
Rousseau, the opera of Mozarts and the symphonies of Beethoven -- before they
were routinely encountered in the flesh of our societies.
The
most profound of our arts have always pointed the way on. The greatest artists
have always been thinking outside the box. Ursula Le Guin is one of them. We
can never have too many.