The most
enjoyable book I've read in months, Elizabeth Gilbert's novel "The
Signature of All Things" is almost all things in itself. A grand novel
about nature? You have it here.
It's about
nature, but not in some sort of "love-letter" way. The book takes
place during the great era of scientific exploration of the natural world that opened to the
West by the 18th century through
geographical exploration, specimen collection, taxonomy; the cultivation in England
and new American republic of plants discovered in Asia, the Americas and the
Pacific; and the resulting theories of how to explain the origin and development of the abundance and
variety of living things.
The novel's
main characters are fictional, but they mix with historical ones, and the
author's use of these sets up interesting goalposts for the great age of nature-science
her main character transits. It begins with Sir Joseph Banks, the dashing young
aristocrat whose voyages to the Pacific with the 18th century English explorer Captain
Cook awoke the curiosity of the English-speaking about the "other side of
the world."
Exploring
Polynesia and other Pacific islands, Banks's notion of science extended to the ethnography
of the open and unrepressed lives of the Polynesians, opening
European eyes to the abundance of the world's peoples and societies. The period
culminates in the 19th century breakthroughs to a science of natural life through
the earth-shaking theories of Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace.
The novel's
central character is Alma Whittaker, whose father rose from humble
circumstances by following up Banks's explorations with the keen commercial eye
of a new age to become the richest man in Pennsylvania. Alma is born into her father's company's international interests and his estate's material and scientific
wealth. Her childhood is equivalent to a university eduction. Her home is a
botanical paradise. But her education is short on ordinary human connections
since her father is interested only in using people and few peers penetrate her
privileged world.
Alma's love
of nature is more of an "absorption," the scientific parallel to
the romantic poets' embrace of nature as a source of wisdom and spiritual
knowledge. She loves knowledge of the natural world and her special gift is
taxonomy -- sorting living things into varieties and species and families; recognizing
the crucial differences between related life forms.
Alma goes through life as a
large brain with an inner hard drive of limitless bytes on top of a tank-like
body. She rolls over the world, cataloging its data. But by the time she
discovers her own human and female needs and desires (oh, brave new world!) the
few friends in her world have paired off. The scientific publisher she
"loves" marries her childlike society friend, never having considered
Alma a possible partner. Her adopted sister marries the nearest male at hand
for purely altruistic reasons Alma doesn't learn about until much later in her
life.
Then out of
nowhere -- or out of the miraculous abundance of life -- the perfect man comes
along. He loves the natural world and sees deeply into it. He's the first genuine
companion of her life, but his devotion to the material world has a spiritual source: If
you want to know God in his creation you must open yourself to it completely. Ambrose
embraces the work of the 16th century mystic Jakob Boehme (see http://prosegarden.blogspot.com/2014/03/reading-book-of-nature-signature-of-all.html) who saw in the
physical character of the world the creator's "signature" and wrote a
book called "The Signature of All Things."
Ambrose's
attempt to follow this spiritual path requires him to live, essentially, like a
plant and give up significant parts of material life such as eating. In the
resulting state of material deprivation you see angels dancing in the structural
minutiae of orchids.... Experience shows however that this state of wonder is likely to leave
you lying half-dead in a snowbank, where (in Ambrose's case) a friend rescues
you and saves your life.
Somewhat moderated
in his current habits, while completely dependent on others for his
maintenance, Ambrose is adopted by the Whittaker business because of his great
ability as a nature artist. Alma, older but desperately in love, marries him
because she believes their regard is mutual. It is up to a point, but that
point is a crucial one for Alma, a deal-breaker and -- near spoiler alert!
-- Alma makes decisions that destroy the peace of her contented, but cloistered
life as the world's finest student of mosses, her special study.
She leaves
her sheltered nature-science paradise of a home, travels to Tahiti, traces
Ambrose's exile, discovers people and facts of human life that challenge her
upbringing, gives up (or loses) all her possessions, surrenders her father's wealth and everything else she
has -- except her mind. Her mind finds a paradise of mosses in Polynesia and her
scientific training and gifts lead her to attempt the great intellectual
challenge of her age: making sense of the natural world. How did things get to
be the way they are: the near infinite array and diversity of places, peoples,
species, varieties, plants, bugs, animals, and survival mechanisms. What are
the "scientific laws" operating to make it so?
She leaves
the Pacific for the other side of the world, Europe, to explore one side of her
own roots and discovers truly fortunate conditions for the maturation of her
own studies and her theories. She is "there" -- intellectually -- when
Charles Darwin and the much less well known Alfred Wallace declare their
theories almost simultaneously. Darwin's term, "evolution," and his
more copiously developed evidentiary basis (the work of decades) win the renown
of the ages.
In her last
days Alma seeks out Wallace -- a quirky common man and social outsider like herself -- to offer her recognition of
his accomplishment and seek a little bit for herself. Wallace, interestingly, is
inclined to understand and embrace the universe in a way reminiscent of Ambrose's,
while Alma clings to what we can know: 'all things' in the here and now.
I loved the
book for many of the usual reasons. The storytelling was good, the characters smart
and likable, the narrative voice engaging. But the book's center also engages very
central questions of life, the kind of things you think about when you're
raking the leaves off the first emergences of spring: how do we explain the
world we are part of?
No comments:
Post a Comment